Fabry–Pérot resonance coupling associated exceptional points in a composite grating structure
Jiang Zhi-Sen1, 2, Hu De-Jiao3, Pang Lin1, 2, †, Gao Fu-Hua1, 2, Wang Ping1, 2
Key Laboratory of High Energy Density Physics and Technology of Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
College of Physical Science and Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Optical Fiber Sensing and Communications, Institute of Photonics Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: lin.lpang@gmail.com

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61377054 and 61675140).

Abstract

The exceptional point (EP) is a significant and attractive phenomenon in an open quantum system. The scattering properties of light are similar to those in the open quantum system, which makes it possible to achieve EP in the optic system. Here we investigate the EP in a Fabry–Pérot (F–P) resonant coupling structure. The coupling between different types of F–P resonances leads to a near zero reflection, which results in a degeneration of eigenstates and thus the appearing of EP. Furthermore, the multi-wavelength EPs and unidirectional invisibility can be achieved which may be used in integrated photonics systems.

1. Introduction

A non-Hermitian Hamiltonian is used to describe an open quantum system which is subjected to a dissipation process.[1] A very important and attractive singular phenomenon called the exceptional point (EP) will arise[2] from the eigenstates of non-Hermitian Hamiltonian studies. EPs are branch point singularities of the spectrum. It leads to phenomena including level repulsion and cross, bifurcation, chaos and phase transitions, which are all attributed to the coalescence of both eigenvalues and corresponding eigenstates.[38] In the past few years, EP has been achieved in many systems such as microwave cavities,[7] atom–cavity quantum composites,[9] exciton–polariton billiards,[10] optical micro-cavities[11,12] and waveguides.[13]

The close analogy of the scattering properties between optical systems and open quantum systems has attracted a lot of attention.[6,1416] Generally, optical systems and open quantum systems have similar scattering form. In electromagnetism, for sub-wavelength metallic grating, the long-lived trapped electromagnetic field modes, which causes enhanced[17] and inhibited[18] transmittance, have a similar way of transient trapping the scattered particles in quantum mechanics.[19] Therefore, EPs in an optical system by manipulating the elements in the corresponding optical scattering matrix can be achieved. Based on this analogy, Feng et al. demonstrated the exceptional point in a multilayer structure by carefully tuning the imaginary part of the refractive index of the constituent material.[16] Considering the difficulties in modulating the refractive index profile in practice, Kang et al. achieved an EP by tuning the geometric parameters of an ultra-thin hybridized metamaterial.[15] In addition, in a Fano-resonance graphene metamaterial, Liu et al. achieved an EP by tuning the chemical potential of graphene.[6]

In this work, we exploit the coupling between two different types of Fabry–Pérot (F–P) resonances which are realized by a composite grating structure. The structure consists of a thick grating and an ultra-thin grating, which can be used to support a coupling effect between different F–P resonances. Owing to the geometric parameters dependent coupling effect, zero reflection can be observed, which corresponds to the degeneration of the eigenvalue and further the emergence of an EP. The extraordinary properties of the eigenvalues and the topological structure of the EP are investigated. Furthermore, unidirectional invisibility can be achieved at the EP, where the structure holds different reflective behaviors from both sides. Unlike previous work, our structure can be used to support multi-wavelength EPs, which is of great value for photonic devices such as asymmetric multi-band filters.

2. F–P resonance coupling and the EP in a composite grating structure

The optimized scheme of the composite structure is shown in Fig. 1(a). The structure consists of a thick gold strip grating and an ultra-thin gold strip grating surrounded by air. The height and width of thick and ultra-thin strips are H = 650 nm, W = 300 nm and h = 10 nm, w = 250 nm, respectively. The period of both strips is P = 400 nm. The two gratings are separated by air gaps with an interval G and have a lateral displacement of L = 175 nm. Only normally incident p-polarized plane EM radiation is considered here, where the electric field is perpendicular to the slits. The refraction index of gold is obtained from Ref. [20]. Figure 1(b) shows the side view of the structure. The forward direction means light incident from the thick grating side, while the backward direction refers to light incident from the ultra-thin grating side.

Fig. 1. (color online) (a) Schematic diagram of the composite metallic grating structure with the geometrical parameters H, W, P, G, L, h, w and the direction of the p-polarized incident light. (b) Schematic diagram of scattering properties of the structure under normal incidence from forward and backward directions.

The similarity of scattering properties between the optical system and open quantum system has been mentioned before. For the structure shown in Fig. 1(a), the light propagation properties can be described by the matrix S

where and are amplitudes of the incoming and outgoing wave in the forward and backward directions, respectively, as shown in Fig. 1(b). The system is reciprocal, so the transmission coefficients t on both sides are the same. While the reflection coefficients rf and rb in forward and backward directions are different. The eigenvalues of Eq. (1) are , and the corresponding eigenvectors are . Based on the fact that both eigenvalues and eigenvectors coalesce at the EP, the EP will appear in the eigenvalue spectrum when either rf or rb is zero. That is to say, one of the reflections and is zero. Another important property of the EP is the phase singularity. At the EP, complex reflection coefficient means that the phase φf experiences a dislocation. The zero reflection and phase dislocation can be utilized to find the EP.

In this composite grating structure, two types of F–P resonances can be realized. The thick grating possesses an enhanced transmission that stems from the F–P resonant-like mode in the grating apertures (aperture mode).[21,22] Another type of F–P resonance is generated in the internal air gap of the structure (gap mode). Because of the existence of the ultra-thin grating, the interval air gap can be regarded as an F–P resonator. The incident light will match to an outgoing propagating wave in the lower surface of thick grating and generate F–P resonance in the air gap resonator. These two modes form a standing-wave shape of magnetic field distribution which is demonstrated in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b). More importantly, due to the spatial proximity, a strong coupling will appear between aperture mode and gap mode and lead to a level repulsion in the reflection spectra.[23]

Fig. 2. (color online) (a) Magnetic field distribution of aperture mode at λ = 900 nm. (b) Magnetic field distribution of the gap mode at λ = 1100 nm and G = 570 nm. (c) Forward reflection spectra of the composite structure as a function of interval G and wavelength λ. The white dashed line represents aperture mode and the white solid line represents gap mode. The red arrow points to the zero reflection point.

The coupling between aperture mode and gap mode can be described by a 2 × 2 Hamiltonian matrix.[24] By diagonalizing the matrix, the coupled eigenstates can be obtained and the difference between the coupled energy levels is

where and are eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian matrix, W and V are complex coupling constants, E1 and E2 are energy levels of uncoupled aperture mode and gap mode, respectively.

In this composite structure, due to the closely connection between the apertures of thick grating and the internal air gap, a direct interchange of energy leads to a strong coupling when both aperture mode and gap mode are triggered. This means a large coupling constant (W and V) and a large value of . As a consequence, the energy level is effectively forced apart and a level repulsion appears in the reflection spectra.

As shown in Fig. 2(c), the level repulsion appears in the forward reflection spectrum. The interval G will influence the happening of coupling. With the increase of G, gap mode will be generated at different wavelengths.[23] All of the arising gap modes in Fig. 2(c) will couple with aperture mode and generate level repulsion, which can be seen at the cross between white dash line (aperture mode) and solid line (gap mode). Due to the strong coupling, each branch of the repulsed level causes a minimal value of reflection. Because of the low transmission efficiency of the high-order F–P resonant mode of the aperture mode at a shorter wavelength (i.e., λ = 900 nm),[21] only a low-order resonant mode of aperture mode at a longer wavelength (i.e., λ = 1845 nm) can generate a zero reflection by coupling. Hence, we focus on the coupling located at the bottom-right corner of Fig. 2(c). At the parameters of λ = 1620 nm and G = 288 nm, which is pointed to by the red arrow, a nearly zero reflection shows up.

For more details, we plot the reflection spectra from forward and backward directions in the vicinity of the zero reflection point as shown in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b). A nadir can be seen at λ = 1620 nm and G = 288 nm in the forward reflection spectra. In addition, at this point, the backward reflection Rb is 0.01, and the contrast ratio approaches 1, which indicates a unidirectional reflection. Furthermore, as can be seen in Fig. 3(c), with a slight change in wavelength λ and interval G, φf undergoes a sharp change in the vicinity of the zero reflection point. In contrast, the reflection phase φb from the backward direction exhibits a flatter dispersion as seen in Fig. 3(d). The zero reflection and phase dislocation confirm the existence of an EP in our structure.

Fig. 3. (color online) (a) Forward and (c) backward reflection spectra as a function of wavelength λ and interval G. (b) Forward and (d) backward phase of reflection coefficients.
3. Properties of the EP

For more information about the EP, the topological structures of eigenvalues are demonstrated. As shown in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b), the real and imaginary part of two eigenvalues are plotted as a function of the incident wavelength λ and the interval G in the vicinity of the EP, respectively. Red represents the Riemann surface of eigenvalue S1 and blue represents the Riemann surface of eigenvalue S2. In the vicinity of the EP, the Riemann surfaces experience cross or repulsion which is located at λ = 1620 nm and G = 288 nm, as pointed to by the white arrow. When the interval G decreases from 288 nm to 260 nm, the real parts of eigenvalues cross while the imaginary parts are repulsed. However, when G increases from 288 nm to 320 nm, the real and imaginary parts are repulsed and crossed, respectively.

Fig. 4. (color online) (a) Real and (b) imaginary parts of eigenvalues S1 (red) and S2 (blue) each as a function of incident wavelength λ and interval G. Re(S) indicates the real parts of S1 and S2 and Im(S) indicates the imaginary parts of S1 and S2. The white arrow points to the position of the EP. Eigenvalues S1 and S2 for real part at (c) G = 281 nm and (e) G = 295 nm and for the imaginary part at (e) G = 281 nm and (f) G = 295 nm.

We focus on the real and imaginary part of eigenvalues at G = 281 nm and G = 295 nm as shown in Figs. 4(c)4(f), which can give clearer information about the changes of eigenvalues around the EP. The eigenvalues show level crossing in the real part (see Fig. 4(c)) and level repulsion in the imaginary part (see Fig. 4(d)) at G = 281 nm while the eigenvalues show level repulsion in the real part (see Fig. 4(e)) and level crossing in the imaginary part (see Fig. 4(f)) at G = 295 nm. The variation of real (imaginary) part of the eigenvalue is convincing evidence for the EP in our system, in which the level varies from the cross (repulsion) to repulsion (cross) with interval G increasing from G = 281 nm to G = 295 nm which strides the zero reflection point. A more important property can be seen in Figs. 4(d) and 4(e) where the imaginary and real part of each eigenvalue join into each other and turn into one level. That is to say, when we encircle the EP with one loop in the parameter space constituted by the wavelength λ and interval G, the real and imaginary part of each eigenvalue will be converted into each other. This phenomenon is an important topological property of the EP, which may find applications in optical switches.[25]

4. Applications of the EP in a composite grating structure

The F–P resonance coupling associated EP can find applications in controlling light propagation, such as in multi-band filter and unidirectional invisibility. As mentioned before, the coupling between different aperture modes and gap modes can generate many different level repulsions and lead to minimal reflection. Based on this fact, by optimizing the geometric parameters, more than one EP can be realized at different wavelengths in our structure with a fixed geometry.

As can be seen in Fig. 5(a), the reflection spectrum shows two zero reflection points at G = 750 nm. The heights of thick and ultra-thin grating change to H = 1900 nm and h = 10.6 nm, respectively, while other parameters remain the same as those in Fig. 1(a). Corresponding forward reflections are and for point 1 and 2 at λ = 1177 nm and λ = 1644 nm, respectively, which are very close to zero. It includes two different couplings of aperture mode and gap mode which occur at around λ = 1214 nm, G = 686 nm, and λ = 1612 nm, G = 951 nm, as can be seen at the cross between the white dashed line and the solid line. Furthermore, the phases of forward-reflection coefficients φf of points 1 and 2 are demonstrated in Figs. 5(b) and 5(c) where phase dislocation at a corresponding wavelength can also be seen, which confirms the appearance of multi-wavelength EPs in our structure. This property may lead to potential applications in optical devices like asymmetric multi-band filter.

Fig. 5. (color online) (a) Forward reflection spectrum as a function of interval G and wavelength λ, with H = 1900 nm and h = 10.6 nm, and other parameters are the same as those in Fig. 1(a). The white dashed line represents aperture mode and white solid line refers to gap mode. The white arrow points to the zero reflection points 1 and 2 both at G = 751 nm. ((b), (c)) Forward phases of reflection coefficients in the vicinity of points 1 and 2.

Unidirectional invisibility means that light can only be reflected from one side of the optical system. It can be visualized by the magnetic field distribution as shown in Fig. 6. For EP in Fig. 3, when the light is incident from the backward direction, the magnetic field distribution forms an interference pattern at the bottom of the structure, which means that the light is reflected back by the structure and results in a nonzero reflection. While light is incident from the forward direction, no interference pattern emerges, which indicates zero reflection. This asymmetric reflection property can be utilized in realizing unidirectional invisibility devices.[16]

Fig. 6. (color online) (a) Magnetic field distribution with light incident from backward direction and (b) magnetic field distribution with light incident from the forward direction of the EP at λ = 1500 nm. The white arrow points to the incident direction.
5. Conclusions

In this work, we have achieved two kinds of F–P resonances by using a well-designed composite metallic grating structure which consists of one thick grating and one ultra-thin grating. This structure supports strong coupling between different types of F–P resonances, which results in a level repulsion in the reflection spectrum and makes it possible to achieve the EP. The zero reflection and phase dislocation are found in the parameter space where the EP is located. The topological structure of eigenvalue is studied carefully, and reveals the unique singularity property of the EP. Finally, the ability to achieve multi-wavelength EPs and unidirectional reflection by coupling is demonstrated, which may find potential applications in photonic devices such as asymmetric multi-band filters and in unidirectional invisibility devices.

Reference
[1] Moiseyev N 2011 Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics Cambridge University Press 250
[2] Heiss W D 2012 J. Phys. Math. Theor. 45 444016
[3] Heiss W D Sannino A L 1990 J. Phys. Math. Gen. 23 1167
[4] Heiss W D 1999 Eur. Phys. J. -At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 7 1
[5] Heiss W D 2000 Phys. Rev. 61 929
[6] Liu Q Wang B Ke S Long H Wang K Lu P 2017 Opt. Express 25 7203
[7] Dembowski C Gräf H D Harney H L Heine A Heiss W D Rehfeld H Richter A 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 787
[8] Dembowski C Dietz B Gräf H D Harney H L Heine A Heiss W D Richter A 2004 Phys. Rev. 69 056261
[9] Choi Y Kang S Lim S Kim W Kim J R Lee J H An K 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 153601
[10] Gao T Estrecho E Bliokh K Y Liew T C H Fraser M D Brodbeck S Kamp M Schneider C Höfling S Yamamoto Y Nori F Kivshar Y S Truscott A G Dall R G Ostrovskaya E A 2015 Nature 526 554
[11] Lee S Y Ryu J W Kim S W Chung Y 2012 Phys. Rev. 85 064103
[12] Lee S B Yang J Moon S Lee S Y Shim J B Kim S W Lee J H An K 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 134101
[13] Ke S Wang B Qin C Long H Wang K Lu P 2016 J. Light. Technol. 34 5258
[14] Cui H X Cao X W Kang M Li T F Yang M Guo T J Guo Q H Chen J 2013 Opt. Express 21 13368
[15] Kang M Cui H X Li T F Chen J Zhu W Premaratne M 2014 Phys. Rev. 89 065801
[16] Feng L Zhu X Yang S Zhu H Zhang P Yin X Wang Y Zhang X 2014 Opt. Express 22 1760
[17] Porto J A García-Vidal F J Pendry J B 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 2845
[18] Hu D Wang P Zhang Z Pang L Kim S Du J 2015 J. Opt. Soc. Am. 32 1369
[19] Marinica D C Borisov A G Shabanov S V 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 183902
[20] Johnson P B Christy R W 1972 Phys. Rev. 6 4370
[21] Astilean S Lalanne P Palamaru M 2000 Opt. Commun. 175 265
[22] Xie Y Zakharian A R Moloney J V Mansuripur M 2005 Opt. Express 13 4485
[23] Cheng C Chen J Shi D J Wu Q Y Ren F F Xu J Fan Y X Ding J Wang H T 2008 Phys. Rev. 78 075406
[24] Wiersig J 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 253901
[25] Liertzer M Ge L Cerjan A Stone A D Türeci H E Rotter S 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 173901